The Illusion of Compliance: What’s Still Missing in Industrial EU Data Act Strategies

Latest Comments

No comments to show.

In the industrial IoT space, many companies are racing to align with the EU Data Act, building internal frameworks around data access, interoperability, and system security. On the surface, these efforts seem to check all the boxes.

  • Device data is made accessible
  • Data is exportable through APIs
  • Interoperability is addressed via open architecture
  • Regulatory standards (EN12830, HACCP, etc.) are ticked off

But here’s the problem: Data compliance isn’t just about technical integrations or API readiness.

Too often, companies overlook the three most critical components of Data Act readiness:

  • Customer consent management
  • Third-party billing and monetization control
  • Complex ownership management

The Overlooked Layer: Customer Consent

The EU Data Act gives end users—individuals or businesses—control over the data generated by connected products.
This means that no data should be shared or monetized unless the end user has explicitly granted consent.

Yet, most internal systems in industrial companies still lack:

  • A consent management interface for end users
  • A granular authorization system for enabling or restricting third-party access
  • A transparent log or audit trail of who accessed what data and when

This isn’t just a legal checkbox—it’s a trust-building feature. And in industrial markets, where clients are other businesses, trust and accountability are everything.

The Monetization Gap: Billing, Usage Tracking & Revenue Management

Many industrial firms are eager to monetize their IoT data—for example, by offering access to resellers, fleet managers, or analytics providers. Because this is a new revenue channel that have been untapped so far.

But without a platform that supports:

  • Automated usage tracking
  • Billing per API call, data volume, or subscription
  • Multi-party invoicing and pricing logic

…you’re leaving money on the table and creating massive compliance risk.

Under the EU Data Act, data-sharing must be transparent and fairly priced. That means your platform must be able to:

  • Show who is using the data
  • Measure how it’s used
  • Invoice accordingly

Why Internal Solutions Fall Short

While internal solutions may successfully manage technical compliance (like integrating open APIs or meeting data export standards), they typically:

  • Don’t include end-user portals for consent control
  • Lack a revenue and billing system for commercializing data
  • Cannot easily scale across multi-stakeholder ecosystems (OEMs, service providers, users)

This means companies risk:

  • Violating consent requirements under the Data Act
  • Losing revenue due to lack of billing infrastructure
  • Lagging behind competitors who build trust through compliance and user control

The Steelbridge Solution

At Steelbridge, we’ve built our EU Data Act Platform to solve exactly these issues.

Consent Management :

Let end users—whether a person or another business—control data access in real time. Full traceability, revocable permissions, and fine-grained authorization.

Data Monetization & Billing Layer:

Track how data is used by third parties, manage commercial terms, and automate billing workflows—all in one platform.

Multi-Stakeholder Design:

Designed for industrial environments with OEMs, integrators, resellers, and end users all needing coordinated access to device-generated data.

If you’re in manufacturing, logistics, or any industrial IoT-driven field and think you’re already “compliant” with the EU Data Act—think again.

Compliance is more than data access and APIs.
It’s about putting control in the hands of your customers, and tracking how your data is used—ethically, securely, and profitably.

That’s where Steelbridge comes in.

Learn more at steelbridge.fi and let’s build compliance into your competitive edge.

CATEGORIES:

Uncategorized

Comments are closed